Search for: All records

Abstract Accurate 3D reconstruction is essential for high-throughput plant phenotyping, particularly for studying complex structures such as root systems. While photogrammetry and Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques have become widely used for 3D root imaging, the camera settings used are often underreported in studies, and the impact of camera calibration on model accuracy remains largely underexplored in plant science. In this study, we systematically evaluate the effects of focus, aperture, exposure time, and gain settings on the quality of 3D root models made with a multi-camera scanning system. We show through a series of experiments that calibration significantly improves model quality, with focus misalignment and shallow depth of field (DoF) being the most important factors affecting reconstruction accuracy. Our results further show that proper calibration has a greater effect on reducing noise than filtering it during post-processing, emphasizing the importance of optimizing image acquisition rather than relying solely on computational corrections. This work improves the repeatability and accuracy of 3D root phenotyping by giving useful calibration guidelines. This leads to better trait quantification for use in crop research and plant breeding. 

Abstract As with phenotyping of any microscopic appendages, such as cilia or antennae, phenotyping of root hairs has been a challenge due to their complex intersecting arrangements in two-dimensional images and the technical limitations of automated measurements. Digital Imaging of Root Traits at Microscale (DIRT/μ) is a newly developed algorithm that addresses this issue by computationally resolving intersections and extracting individual root hairs from two-dimensional microscopy images. This solution enables automatic and precise trait measurements of individual root hairs. DIRT/μ rigorously defines a set of rules to resolve intersecting root hairs and minimizes a newly designed cost function to combinatorically identify each root hair in the microscopy image. As a result, DIRT/μ accurately measures traits such as root hair length distribution and root hair density, which are impractical for manual assessment. We tested DIRT/μ on three datasets to validate its performance and showcase potential applications. By measuring root hair traits in a fraction of the time manual methods require, DIRT/μ eliminates subjective biases from manual measurements. Automating individual root hair extraction accelerates phenotyping and quantifies trait variability within and among plants, creating new possibilities to characterize root hair function and their underlying genetics. 

Challenge:  Digital Imaging of root traits 3D (DIRT/3D) [1] is a software to measure 3D root traits on excavated roots crowns from the field. However, quantifying 3D root traits remains a challenge due to the unknown tradeoff between 3D root-model quality and 3D root-trait accuracy [2].  Questions: Can the 3D root model reconstruction be improved while reducing the image-capturing effort?  Does improved 3D root model quality increase the accuracy of trait measurements? Evaluation:  Compare reconstruction performance of  five open-source 3D model reconstruction pipelines on 12 architecturally contrasting genotypes [1] of field-grown maize roots.  Evaluate the accuracy of 3D root traits between the original implementation of DIRT/3D based on VisualSFM with an implementation based on COLMAP. Conclusion:  The updated DIRT/3D (COLMAP) pipeline enables quicker image collection by reducing the number of images needed and reducing the human factor during image collection. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of 3D root-trait measurements remained uncompromised. 

Abstract Understanding three‐dimensional (3D) root traits is essential to improve water uptake, increase nitrogen capture, and raise carbon sequestration from the atmosphere. However, quantifying 3D root traits by reconstructing 3D root models for deeper field‐grown roots remains a challenge due to the unknown tradeoff between 3D root‐model quality and 3D root‐trait accuracy. Therefore, we performed two computational experiments. We first compared the 3D model quality generated by five state‐of‐the‐art open‐source 3D model reconstruction pipelines on 12 contrasting genotypes of field‐grown maize roots. These pipelines included COLMAP, COLMAP+PMVS (Patch‐based Multi‐View Stereo), VisualSFM, Meshroom, and OpenMVG+MVE (Multi‐View Environment). The COLMAP pipeline achieved the best performance regarding 3D model quality versus computational time and image number needed. In the second test, we compared the accuracy of 3D root‐trait measurement generated by the Digital Imaging of Root Traits 3D pipeline (DIRT/3D) using COLMAP‐based 3D reconstruction with our current DIRT/3D pipeline that uses a VisualSFM‐based 3D reconstruction on the same dataset of 12 genotypes, with 5–10 replicates per genotype. The results revealed that (1) the average number of images needed to build a denser 3D model was reduced from 3000 to 3600 (DIRT/3D [VisualSFM‐based 3D reconstruction]) to around 360 for computational test 1, and around 600 for computational test 2 (DIRT/3D [COLMAP‐based 3D reconstruction]); (2) denser 3D models helped improve the accuracy of the 3D root‐trait measurement; (3) reducing the number of images can help resolve data storage problems. The updated DIRT/3D (COLMAP‐based 3D reconstruction) pipeline enables quicker image collection without compromising the accuracy of 3D root‐trait measurements.